Others have commented that MC should have used a Les Paul. Two thoughts...nobody noted that he did, in fact change to a Les Paul (I believe) for the solo. But also, why should he be totally beholden to what LB did? If he’s just going to repeat the past, why would he even do this? They can get a session player for that. I think he and Neil are hopefully free to diverge from tradition and bring some of themselves to this project...which was ostensibly why they were hired.
Also, LB hasn't played anything other than Turner 1s with FM in the '97-present era. So if people are wanting Mike to play what he played, a Les Paul isn't the answer.
(I am not suggesting Mike should play a Turner. That would be approaching tribute act territory.)