
Slightly off-topic. I much prefer the way this forum is happy to debate issues and sort them out rather than the usual expletive-frenzy you get on most sites if someone says something that others don't agree with without actually explaining things.
Neil, I pretty much agree with your notion that if a record company/artist won't release something it means that BY DEFINITION they don't want to make money from it. BUT, take the Beatles Anthology: that stuff sat in the vaults for 20-odd years before someone decided they DID want to issue it and make money from. Who's to say that in x years' time CH/NF will want to commercially release some live tapes? And who will be the market? All the die-hard fans... who have the stuff already!
Remember here, that I AGREE with you. I'm just saying that it's not always that straightforward
